For those of you who are not familiar with Pinterest, it is an online pin board service where users can collect images, webpages, and product links from across the net and virtually “pin” them for later reference.
Although Pinterest is free to sign up and use they definitely don’t take such a generous view to infringements of its intellectual property. They have fought hard through the courts to protect their intellectual property through trade mark infringement claims – without much success. The problem Pinterest has is the key trade mark concepts which Pinterest wants to protect, “pin” and “pinning”, are not easily protected by trade mark laws.
The Pinterest trade mark wars are a great case study of how descriptive words are notoriously difficult to trade mark.
Pinterest has challenged multiple smaller companies in court over trade mark infringement, and in a number of jurisdictions.
The court also found that the term “pin” was simply too common to be trade marked on its own. In fact, it is just as common as the words “my” and “deal”. This is an important lesson for companies choosing what names and terms to trade mark.
All of these disputes were overseas but there are some lessons applicable to Australia. Trade marks in Australia do not have to be new or unique in order for intellectual property rights to be assigned. But they do need to be sufficiently distinctive in some way, to distinguish them from other goods or services.
Clearly Pinterest wants to stitch up everything “pin” related to enhance its brand value. But Pinterest’s intellectual property wars show us that you cannot trade mark words or terms which are simply too common or generic in their use.
Our greatest asset is our talented and committed people – they enjoy what they do and value the opportunity to work together and with our clients. Our people are from diverse backgrounds and approach their work with intellectual rigour and enthusiasm.